Skip to content

Generalized Expected Utility Theory: The Rank-Dependent Model
Stock Photo: Cover May Be Different

Generalized Expected Utility Theory: The Rank-Dependent Model Hardcover - 1992 - 1993rd Edition

by John Quiggin

  • Used
  • Good
  • Hardcover

Description

Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1992. Hardcover. Good. Former library book. Signs of wear on the cover. Stains on the edge. Different cover. Edition 1992. Ammareal gives back up to 15% of this item's net price to charity organizations.
Used - Good
NZ$99.58
NZ$20.04 Shipping to USA
Standard delivery: 14 to 28 days
More Shipping Options
Ships from AMMAREAL (France)

Details

  • Title Generalized Expected Utility Theory: The Rank-Dependent Model
  • Author John Quiggin
  • Binding Hardcover
  • Edition number 1993rd
  • Edition 1993
  • Condition Used - Good
  • Pages 208
  • Volumes 1
  • Language ENG
  • Publisher Kluwer Academic Publishers
  • Date 1992
  • Illustrated Yes
  • Features Bibliography, Illustrated, Index
  • Bookseller's Inventory # E-406-886
  • ISBN 9780792393023 / 0792393023
  • Weight 1.12 lbs (0.51 kg)
  • Dimensions 9.78 x 6.36 x 0.71 in (24.84 x 16.15 x 1.80 cm)
  • Library of Congress subjects Utility theory - Mathematical models
  • Library of Congress Catalog Number 92036826
  • Dewey Decimal Code 658.403

About AMMAREAL France

Biblio member since 2020
Seller rating: This seller has earned a 5 of 5 Stars rating from Biblio customers.

Ammareal is a professional bookseller specialized in used books. We ship worldwide. We have more than 1 million books in stock, including a large number of technical and university-level books. We give back up to 15% of the price of each book to charities, libraries and organizations fighting in favor of literacy. What we do not sell, we give ; what we do not give, we recycle.

Terms of Sale: 30 day return guarantee, with full refund including original shipping costs for up to 30 days after delivery if an item arrives misdescribed or damaged.

Browse books from AMMAREAL

From the publisher

Economic analysis of choice under uncertainty has been dominated by the expected utility (EU) model, yet the EU model has never been without critics. Psychologists accumulated evidence that individual choices under uncertainty were inconsistent with the predictions of the EU model. Applied work in areas such as finance was dominated by the simpler mean-variance analysis. In the 1980s this skepticism was dispelled as a number of generalizations of EU were proposed, most of which were capable of explaining evidence inconsistent with EU, while preserving transitivity and dominance.
Generalized expected utility is now a flourishing subfield of economics, with dozens of competing models and considerable literature exploring their theoretical properties and comparing their empirical performance. But the EU model remains the principal tool for the analysis of choice under uncertainty. There is a view that generalized models are too difficult to handle or incapable of generating sharp results. This creates a need to show that the new models can be used in the kinds of economic analysis for which EU has been used, and that they can yield new and interesting results.
This book meets this need by describing one of the most popular generalized models -- the rank-dependent expected utility model (RDEU), also known as anticipated utility, EU with rank-dependent preferences, the dual theory of choice under uncertainty, and simply as rank-dependent utility. As the many names indicate, the model has been approached in many ways by many scientists and for this reason, consideration of a single model sheds light on many of the concerns that have motivated the development of generalized utility models.
The popularity of the RDEU model rests on its simplicity and tractability. The standard tools of analysis developed for EU theory may be applied to the RDEU model, but since RDEU admits behavior inconsistent with EU, thefield of potential applications is widened. As such, the RDEU model is not as much a competitor to EU as an extension based on less restrictive assumptions.