Skip to content

The Webster-Hayne Debate: An Inquiry into the Nature of Union
Stock Photo: Cover May Be Different

The Webster-Hayne Debate: An Inquiry into the Nature of Union Paperback / softback - 2008

by Stefan M. Brooks

  • New
  • Paperback

Description

Paperback / softback. New.
New
NZ$99.78
NZ$20.96 Shipping to USA
Standard delivery: 14 to 21 days
More Shipping Options
Ships from The Saint Bookstore (Merseyside, United Kingdom)

Details

  • Title The Webster-Hayne Debate: An Inquiry into the Nature of Union
  • Author Stefan M. Brooks
  • Binding Paperback / softback
  • Condition New
  • Pages 168
  • Volumes 1
  • Language ENG
  • Publisher University Press of America
  • Date 2008-12-08
  • Features Table of Contents
  • Bookseller's Inventory # B9780761843047
  • ISBN 9780761843047 / 0761843043
  • Weight 0.55 lbs (0.25 kg)
  • Dimensions 8.7 x 5.9 x 0.6 in (22.10 x 14.99 x 1.52 cm)
  • Themes
    • Chronological Period: 19th Century
    • Chronological Period: 1800-1850
  • Library of Congress subjects United States, History
  • Library of Congress Catalog Number 2008935972
  • Dewey Decimal Code 975

About The Saint Bookstore Merseyside, United Kingdom

Biblio member since 2018
Seller rating: This seller has earned a 5 of 5 Stars rating from Biblio customers.

The Saint Bookstore specialises in hard to find titles & also offers delivery worldwide for reasonable rates.

Terms of Sale: Refunds or Returns: A full refund of the price paid will be given if returned within 30 days in undamaged condition. If the product is faulty, we may send a replacement.

Browse books from The Saint Bookstore

From the publisher

In January 1830, a debate on the nature of sovereignty in the American federal union occurred in the United States Senate between Senators Daniel Webster of Massachusetts and Robert Hayne of South Carolina. This debate exposed the critically different understandings of the nature of the American union that, by 1830, had developed between the North and the South and would ultimately lead to civil war in 1861. Stefan Brooks examines the twin theories of union espoused by both senators against Madison's understanding of sovereignty in the Constitution, concluding that the Webster-Hayne Debate reveals the failure of Madison's characterization of the Constitution as a "partly federal, partly national" union and the futility of dividing sovereignty between the United States government and the states. This division of sovereignty represents a defect of the Constitution, an understanding of which helps to explain the collapse of the union into civil war in 1861.

About the author

Stefan Brooks is an Assistant Professor of Political Science at Lindsey Wilson College. He earned his Ph.D. from the University of Houston in 2006. He has published many articles on American politics, foreign policy, world politics and Middle Eastern politics for ABC-CLIO.